IMS Bearing Failed

machine-vibration · 37 views
machine-vibrationperiodic

What It Is

NASA IMS test 2, peak-fault snapshot 2004-02-19 05:02 (file 975 of 984), bearing 1. Outer-race fully failed; RMS ~9x baseline, kurtosis ~17, impulses hitting the ±5 g accelerometer rail. Paired with healthy/degraded sources to expose a 3-point degradation trajectory.

Interpretation

Standard analysis sees: heavy-tailed; left-skewed; time-irreversible (sharp rises, slow decay). The atlas finds no named structure, but the source is distinctively extreme on Continued Fraction:log_khintchine_mean (+3.3z) — beyond what the standard bank predicts for it.

What standard analysis sees
tail heaviness0.91
asymmetry0.03
occupancy0.36
short-range corr0.48
long-range memory0.24
spectral colour0.52
periodicity0.45
complexity0.63
time-irreversibility0.92
volatility clustering0.52
multifractality0.53
dimensionality0.69
nonstationarity0.42
What the atlas adds
Atlas-extreme metrics the standard bank can’t predict for this source
Continued Fraction:log_khintchine_mean+3.3zbank-miss 2.4σ

Composition

dtypefloat64
range[-5, 4.998]
unique values1540 / 16384
mean ± std0.00252 ± 0.674

Render Gallery

Atlas Position

Nearest neighborDistance
BTC Returns3.57cross-origin
IMS Bearing Degraded3.58
MFPT Inner Unloaded3.77

Open in Atlas →

Which Geometries Light Up

Continued Fraction › Continued Fraction:log_khintchine_meanrank 4/3061.9266
Hyperbolic (Poincaré) › Hyperbolic (Poincaré):spatio_temporal_corrrank 5/3060.7739
Julia Set › Julia Set:escape_entropyrank 3/3064.4550
SL(2,ℝ) (Thurston) › SL(2,ℝ) (Thurston):parabolic_fractionrank 5/3060.5901
in machine-vibration
alphabetical
← / → within domain · ⇧← / ⇧→ alphabetical · ⇧← / ⇧→ inside an open render = same view across sources